Editing Talk:Insomnia49
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --[[User:Bubblebobbler|Bubblebobbler]] ([[User talk:Bubblebobbler|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST) | Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --[[User:Bubblebobbler|Bubblebobbler]] ([[User talk:Bubblebobbler|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST) | ||
− |