Editing Talk:Glossary
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Would it be better to put the words in alphabetical order? | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | Let's go with alphabetical until we have everything, then if it's too intimidating we can split things into groups. -Koobadoobs | |
− | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | This will be impossible to do alphabetically, I say we split into groups such as combat (Lit, buffed, ubered, etc), map (Mid, generic names like flank and choke, generic naming schemes like at process last), and meta (Advantage, forward spawns, class makeups for teams). If we wait until we have 50+ terms, it will be really hard to sort. - Waldo |