Template talk:Class guides

I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --garlic (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)