Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pocket"
(Created page with "==Pocket Soldier== The article is focused on pocket soldiers, so I'm cleaning it up to mention pocket heavys or demos.") |
(→Merge) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Pocket Soldier== | ==Pocket Soldier== | ||
The article is focused on pocket soldiers, so I'm cleaning it up to mention pocket heavys or demos. | The article is focused on pocket soldiers, so I'm cleaning it up to mention pocket heavys or demos. | ||
| + | [[User:Stabulous|Stabulous]] ([[User talk:Stabulous|talk]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[Talk:Roaming Soldier]] - Does this really need a separate article? If so can we be consistent and apply the same to the Roamer article? [[User:Spike Himself|- Spike Himself]] ([[User talk:Spike Himself|talk]]) 10:41, 8 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I reckon we have a lot to talk about as far as the roaming and pocket roles go, because they don't limit to 1 class and they are particularly very different, we need someone to add content tho, we certainly have enough for a separate page for both, just not now | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Kaneco|Kaneco]] ([[User talk:Kaneco|talk]]) 13:17, 8 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Merge == | ||
| + | A merge was proposed on the [[Roaming Soldier]] page, so I found it appropiate to suggest a merge of this article with the [[Soldier (6v6)]] article. Please state your opinions on the matter below. --[[User:Atlas|Atlas]] ([[User talk:Atlas|talk]]) 14:31, 8 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | :As Kaneco says above - keep them on the Soldier page for now. When there's enough stuff to write about either, they can have separate pages. [[User:Spike Himself|- Spike Himself]] ([[User talk:Spike Himself|talk]]) 15:20, 8 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 8 July 2013
Pocket Soldier[edit]
The article is focused on pocket soldiers, so I'm cleaning it up to mention pocket heavys or demos. Stabulous (talk)
See Talk:Roaming Soldier - Does this really need a separate article? If so can we be consistent and apply the same to the Roamer article? - Spike Himself (talk) 10:41, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
I reckon we have a lot to talk about as far as the roaming and pocket roles go, because they don't limit to 1 class and they are particularly very different, we need someone to add content tho, we certainly have enough for a separate page for both, just not now
--Kaneco (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
Merge[edit]
A merge was proposed on the Roaming Soldier page, so I found it appropiate to suggest a merge of this article with the Soldier (6v6) article. Please state your opinions on the matter below. --Atlas (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
- As Kaneco says above - keep them on the Soldier page for now. When there's enough stuff to write about either, they can have separate pages. - Spike Himself (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
