User talk:Onespaceman

Very small difference between stock and pro Map League Inclusion Tables

Hi onespaceman,

I reverted your edits to those Map League Inclusion Tables because there is a very small difference between the stock and pro versions of each. The Granary table links to the Granary Pro article in the Granary Pro versions under the "Map version" column, and vice versa; so the two tables actually aren't fully interchangable. Same goes all the other stock/pro tables.

Thought I'd leave a short message to explain why your edits were reverted instead of leaving it unsaid. Thanks for all your recent contributions, especially with keeping the ESEA-I S23 page up to date - it is greatly appreciated :)

Thanks again, --garlic (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello again,

Sorry I'm a little late on the reply. I saw your question on ffc's talk page and thought I should answer it myself.

I see your point about the template being redundant and I agree with it.

However, at the moment I can't think of a feasible way to change the template such that editors won't have to update two templates at once, e.g. updating Granary AND Granary Pro when only GP is included in the next season. The only solution I can think of would be to split the templates (so the Granary table won't show any Granary Pro data + vice versa) but I don't think that is good for readers.

I will keep your suggestion in mind and on my todo list, but until myself/anyone else can find a better solution I don't think it is best to alter the template.

If you have anything to add or a suggestion of your own, let me know on my talk page. --garlic (talk) 07:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: Re: Very small difference between stock and pro Map League Inclusion Tables

Hey man, think you have the wrong guy. garlic/corbt had in fact left a message on your profile and not me <: I've linked his talk page in this text section.

Kind regards,

--Efefknee (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)