Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roaming Soldier"
Karlsquell (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
--[[User:Kaneco|Kaneco]] ([[User talk:Kaneco|talk]]) 16:30, 12 July 2013 (WEST) | --[[User:Kaneco|Kaneco]] ([[User talk:Kaneco|talk]]) 16:30, 12 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| − | + | == Remove pictures/change layout == | |
| + | |||
| + | <s>Atm, I think this page looks a little weird, with the the two pictures in the middle 'cutting of' the title. Any way this could be changed? </s>--[[User:BenBazinga|BenBazinga]] ([[User talk:BenBazinga|talk]]) 20:25, 30 October 2013 (WET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Sure, go for it if you want. I also think it looks a bit out of place. Well class pages need images but they need to be more standard ones and with consistent placements | ||
| + | --[[User:Kaneco|Kaneco]] ([[User talk:Kaneco|talk]]) 23:27, 30 October 2013 (WET) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:27, 30 October 2013
Merge[edit]
This is already covered in Soldier (6v6), right? Why does it have its own page? --Koobadoobs (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2013 (WEST)
- Agreed; this belongs in Soldier (6v6) Spike Himself (talk) 09:10, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
- I think the Roaming (and the Pocket)Soldier roles are such important and predefined parts of the 6es Meta that they deserve their own pages (I would create the roamer page myself if I am allowed to).Additionally there are a few other pages refering to "the roamer" or "the roaming soldier" - these should be linked to this page, right? --Karlsquell (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
- It's a wiki, you're allowed to edit everything. If you troll we'll revert it, otherwise why wouldn't you be allowed to write? Go for it. If we can get enough content we'll keep the page, but I think we agreed in the Pocket Soldier Talk page that these should be merged into the Soldier 6v6 page otherwise. Links from other pages are good too, but content comes first: there's no point directing people to a page that doesn't tell them anything. :) --Koobadoobs (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2013 (WEST)
- And there's always the option of redirecting :) - Spike Himself (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2013 (WEST)
- It's a wiki, you're allowed to edit everything. If you troll we'll revert it, otherwise why wouldn't you be allowed to write? Go for it. If we can get enough content we'll keep the page, but I think we agreed in the Pocket Soldier Talk page that these should be merged into the Soldier 6v6 page otherwise. Links from other pages are good too, but content comes first: there's no point directing people to a page that doesn't tell them anything. :) --Koobadoobs (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2013 (WEST)
- I think the Roaming (and the Pocket)Soldier roles are such important and predefined parts of the 6es Meta that they deserve their own pages (I would create the roamer page myself if I am allowed to).Additionally there are a few other pages refering to "the roamer" or "the roaming soldier" - these should be linked to this page, right? --Karlsquell (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2013 (WEST)
Content[edit]
I just rewrote the page, please check it out and enhance it. I will add a "Bombs" section, and maybe a section for rollout vids? please give me some feedback :) --Karlsquell (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2013 (WEST)
- also: how do I add pictures? :) --Karlsquell (talk) 16:11, 12 July 2013 (WEST)
It looks pretty good so far! nice job! Use the sidebar link that says upload file to upload pictures and then use that filename in the embed image, automatic thumbnails are bugged tho so some images will have issues.
--Kaneco (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2013 (WEST)
Remove pictures/change layout[edit]
Atm, I think this page looks a little weird, with the the two pictures in the middle 'cutting of' the title. Any way this could be changed? --BenBazinga (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2013 (WET)
Sure, go for it if you want. I also think it looks a bit out of place. Well class pages need images but they need to be more standard ones and with consistent placements
--Kaneco (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2013 (WET)
