Difference between revisions of "Talk:High Rollers Gaming"
Koobadoobs (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, if we're gonna have a page for every team that has ever existed, we'll need the old HRG to be somewhere. Probably here (or in a disambiguation). [[User:Koobadoobs|Koobadoobs]] ([[User talk:Koobadoobs|talk]]) 01:59, 11 July 2013 (WEST) | Well, if we're gonna have a page for every team that has ever existed, we'll need the old HRG to be somewhere. Probably here (or in a disambiguation). [[User:Koobadoobs|Koobadoobs]] ([[User talk:Koobadoobs|talk]]) 01:59, 11 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Yeah, similar idea for other teams with sponsor names, Vector/crack clan/etc.... | ||
| + | ===one solution=== | ||
| + | if we have more than one page for a certain sponsored team (past/present/future), make the page (High Rollers Gaming) point to the team page of the players currently sponsored, ([[High Rollers Gaming]] redirects to [[bp]]) with a hatnote like: | ||
| + | {{Hatnote| This page refers to the team currently sponsored by High Rollers Gaming, for teams sponsored in the past by HRG, see [[High Rollers Gaming (disambiguation)]]}} | ||
| + | Would do well to create a new disambiguation hatnote template for these situations ^_^ | ||
| + | [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 05:44, 12 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | we could do something like change the title at the top of the article using [[Template:DISPLAYTITLE]] [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 08:14, 12 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Teams vs. Organizations. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Both iT and HRG are organizations not teams. For instance HRG sponsored a TF2 team in S10 but it wasn't anything like the current team. It seems like this could be solved in a few ways: bp would be the team page and iT would be the organization page OR iT would be the team page and iT (Organization) would be the organization page. Any thought? [[User:Merchant|Merchant]] ([[User talk:Merchant|talk]]) 05:22, 29 September 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Probably would be best to keep the name consistent so if a team as the same name as a organization you should have the team page, and the organization page as Team Name (Organization) | ||
| + | Ex: Infused has 2 team pages atm [[Team_Infused]], [[Team Infused (old)]], if one were to create the organization page it would be [[Team Infused (Organization)]] and it should probably link to both team pages. All pages should have a disambiguation header as seen on wikipedia. | ||
| + | : This seems to be the best solution. [[User:Thesupremecommander|Thesupremecommander]] ([[User talk:Thesupremecommander|talk]]) 21:44, 1 October 2013 (WEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 1 October 2013
In this page, should we talk about the current team High Rollers Gaming, or all the teams it has sponsored? Not sure about this.
Well, if we're gonna have a page for every team that has ever existed, we'll need the old HRG to be somewhere. Probably here (or in a disambiguation). Koobadoobs (talk) 01:59, 11 July 2013 (WEST)
Yeah, similar idea for other teams with sponsor names, Vector/crack clan/etc....
one solution[edit]
if we have more than one page for a certain sponsored team (past/present/future), make the page (High Rollers Gaming) point to the team page of the players currently sponsored, (High Rollers Gaming redirects to bp) with a hatnote like:
- This page refers to the team currently sponsored by High Rollers Gaming, for teams sponsored in the past by HRG, see High Rollers Gaming (disambiguation)
Would do well to create a new disambiguation hatnote template for these situations ^_^ Maxim (talk) 05:44, 12 July 2013 (WEST)
we could do something like change the title at the top of the article using Template:DISPLAYTITLE Maxim (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2013 (WEST)
Teams vs. Organizations.[edit]
Both iT and HRG are organizations not teams. For instance HRG sponsored a TF2 team in S10 but it wasn't anything like the current team. It seems like this could be solved in a few ways: bp would be the team page and iT would be the organization page OR iT would be the team page and iT (Organization) would be the organization page. Any thought? Merchant (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2013 (WEST)
Probably would be best to keep the name consistent so if a team as the same name as a organization you should have the team page, and the organization page as Team Name (Organization) Ex: Infused has 2 team pages atm Team_Infused, Team Infused (old), if one were to create the organization page it would be Team Infused (Organization) and it should probably link to both team pages. All pages should have a disambiguation header as seen on wikipedia.
- This seems to be the best solution. Thesupremecommander (talk) 21:44, 1 October 2013 (WEST)
