Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Koobadoobs (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let's go with alphabetical until we have everything, then if it's too intimidating we can split things into groups. -Koobadoobs | Let's go with alphabetical until we have everything, then if it's too intimidating we can split things into groups. -Koobadoobs | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This will be impossible to do alphabetically, I say we split into groups such as combat (Lit, buffed, ubered, etc), map (Mid, generic names like flank and choke, generic naming schemes like at process last), and meta (Advantage, forward spawns, class makeups for teams). If we wait until we have 50+ terms, it will be really hard to sort. - Waldo | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 1 July 2013
Would it be better to put the words in alphabetical order?
Let's go with alphabetical until we have everything, then if it's too intimidating we can split things into groups. -Koobadoobs
This will be impossible to do alphabetically, I say we split into groups such as combat (Lit, buffed, ubered, etc), map (Mid, generic names like flank and choke, generic naming schemes like at process last), and meta (Advantage, forward spawns, class makeups for teams). If we wait until we have 50+ terms, it will be really hard to sort. - Waldo
