Difference between revisions of "Talk:Insomnia49"
(Created page with "Just as an FYI, the reason I'm putting line breaks (<code><nowiki><br /></nowiki></code>) in the tables for team results is so that the collapse/expand is above the table as o...") |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just as an FYI, the reason I'm putting line breaks (<code><nowiki><br /></nowiki></code>) in the tables for team results is so that the collapse/expand is above the table as opposed to crammed right beside it. If I could, I would have it centered, but there's no way to do that easily AFAIK. Let me know if this is undesirable. [[User:Thesupremecommander|Thesupremecommander]] ([[User talk:Thesupremecommander|talk]]) 13:19, 24 August 2013 (WEST) | Just as an FYI, the reason I'm putting line breaks (<code><nowiki><br /></nowiki></code>) in the tables for team results is so that the collapse/expand is above the table as opposed to crammed right beside it. If I could, I would have it centered, but there's no way to do that easily AFAIK. Let me know if this is undesirable. [[User:Thesupremecommander|Thesupremecommander]] ([[User talk:Thesupremecommander|talk]]) 13:19, 24 August 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --[[User:Bubblebobbler|Bubblebobbler]] ([[User talk:Bubblebobbler|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST) | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 28 August 2013
Just as an FYI, the reason I'm putting line breaks (<br />) in the tables for team results is so that the collapse/expand is above the table as opposed to crammed right beside it. If I could, I would have it centered, but there's no way to do that easily AFAIK. Let me know if this is undesirable. Thesupremecommander (talk) 13:19, 24 August 2013 (WEST)
Is it right to refer to a team as 'the best team'? Even with results supporting it, it is still speculation and should be avoided I think, ie: in this article, rather than talking about how HRG are the best team from North America, it'd make more sense to call them the reigning ESEA Champions, this also fits better into the editing guidelines of speculation I think. Just my opinion so I'll leave it for now until I get feedback --Bubblebobbler (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (WEST)
