Talk:Editors To Do List

I think we should use the koth_pro_viaduct template for map pages. It gives a good calls section and generally can tell you a lot of info in a short time. Flatline (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2013 (WEST)

The problem is how much space is taken up by pictures and just single word descriptions of places. I like the cp_badlands approach because you learn how the map flows vs. just learning what to call things. --Koobadoobs (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2013 (WEST)

Proposal: Map Pages Move

Alright, we all know that MediaWiki hates lowercase letters and underscores, both of which are prevalent in map names. I would like to propose that we move all maps to the common/proper name for the map (e.g. "Badlands" for cp_badlands, "Viaduct" for koth_viaduct).

I talked with User:Kaneco about this earlier and he brought up the point of the many different versions of maps, especially that of pro vs. normal versions. For that case, I would propose that the article itself has a section describing the differences between the pro and normal versions - there's not really enough to justify the two versions having separate pages when they're pretty similar.

Obviously this will require some time and effort to complete successfully, but I wouldn't mind putting that in. I'd like some feedback, though, before I commit to doing such a major change. Thesupremecommander (talk) 04:45, 25 August 2013 (WEST)