Difference between revisions of "Talk:Editors To Do List"
Koobadoobs (talk | contribs) |
(→Proposal: Map Pages Move: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The problem is how much space is taken up by pictures and just single word descriptions of places. I like the [[cp_badlands]] approach because you learn how the map flows vs. just learning what to call things. --[[User:Koobadoobs|Koobadoobs]] ([[User talk:Koobadoobs|talk]]) 21:44, 2 July 2013 (WEST) | The problem is how much space is taken up by pictures and just single word descriptions of places. I like the [[cp_badlands]] approach because you learn how the map flows vs. just learning what to call things. --[[User:Koobadoobs|Koobadoobs]] ([[User talk:Koobadoobs|talk]]) 21:44, 2 July 2013 (WEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposal: Map Pages Move == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Alright, we all know that MediaWiki hates lowercase letters and underscores, both of which are prevalent in map names. I would like to propose that we move all maps to the common/proper name for the map (e.g. "Badlands" for cp_badlands, "Viaduct" for koth_viaduct). | ||
| + | |||
| + | I talked with [[User:Kaneco]] about this earlier and he brought up the point of the many different versions of maps, especially that of pro vs. normal versions. For that case, I would propose that the article itself has a section describing the differences between the pro and normal versions - there's not really enough to justify the two versions having separate pages when they're pretty similar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Obviously this will require some time and effort to complete successfully, but I wouldn't mind putting that in. I'd like some feedback, though, before I commit to doing such a major change. [[User:Thesupremecommander|Thesupremecommander]] ([[User talk:Thesupremecommander|talk]]) 04:45, 25 August 2013 (WEST) | ||
Revision as of 03:45, 25 August 2013
I think we should use the koth_pro_viaduct template for map pages. It gives a good calls section and generally can tell you a lot of info in a short time. Flatline (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2013 (WEST)
The problem is how much space is taken up by pictures and just single word descriptions of places. I like the cp_badlands approach because you learn how the map flows vs. just learning what to call things. --Koobadoobs (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2013 (WEST)
Proposal: Map Pages Move
Alright, we all know that MediaWiki hates lowercase letters and underscores, both of which are prevalent in map names. I would like to propose that we move all maps to the common/proper name for the map (e.g. "Badlands" for cp_badlands, "Viaduct" for koth_viaduct).
I talked with User:Kaneco about this earlier and he brought up the point of the many different versions of maps, especially that of pro vs. normal versions. For that case, I would propose that the article itself has a section describing the differences between the pro and normal versions - there's not really enough to justify the two versions having separate pages when they're pretty similar.
Obviously this will require some time and effort to complete successfully, but I wouldn't mind putting that in. I'd like some feedback, though, before I commit to doing such a major change. Thesupremecommander (talk) 04:45, 25 August 2013 (WEST)
